The Myth of Protection : Gendering Protection under the Responsibility to Protect in Gaza

Logo poskytovatele

Varování

Publikace nespadá pod Pedagogickou fakultu, ale pod Fakultu sociálních studií. Oficiální stránka publikace je na webu muni.cz.
Autoři

SPITKA Timea

Rok publikování 2019
Druh Článek v odborném periodiku
Časopis / Zdroj Global Responsibility to Protect
Fakulta / Pracoviště MU

Fakulta sociálních studií

Citace
www abstract
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-01101005
Klíčová slova Responsibility to protect; women - peace and security; Gaza; protection - Israeli/Palestinian conflict
Přiložené soubory
Popis Although international norms on the Responsibility to Protect (R2P ), norms stemming from United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 and the agenda of Women, Peace and Security (wps) have shifted the narrative from a state-centric to a human-centric approach to security, they have failed to intersect in the most difficult contexts. This paper examines the intersections between Pillar iii of R2P, Resolution 1325 and the agenda of wps with a focus on protection in Gaza. Within the Gaza context, all authorities can be seen as failing in their responsibility to protect, however, no steps have been taken toward operationalisation of protection under R2P. Examining protection through a gendered lens provides a critical mirror of strategies of protection as well as a roadmap towards improvement. The article argues that R2P in combination with the agenda of wps provides a potential tool for constructing a consensus prioritising protection of civilians in the most difficult contexts.
Související projekty:

Používáte starou verzi internetového prohlížeče. Doporučujeme aktualizovat Váš prohlížeč na nejnovější verzi.