Between vulnerability and resistance : Rhetorical strategies in Indigenous Canadian nonfiction

Warning

This publication doesn't include Faculty of Education. It includes Faculty of Arts. Official publication website can be found on muni.cz.
Authors

HORÁKOVÁ Martina

Year of publication 2021
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source The Journal of Commonwealth Literature
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Arts

Citation
Web https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0021989420975049?casa_token=OGQvqUtR9SQAAAAA:AtmWyfuj6l4fOV7S4gm2iLy-7k9nHwdnom6U4GWLXzGQNzb5CWTpBp1ModzNJfO2XEIEhTw550Zf
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021989420975049
Keywords Canadian literature; Henry Kreisel Lecture series; Indigenous nonfiction; resistance; vulnerability; Eden Robinson; Tomson Highway; Judith Butler
Attached files
Description This article explores two Henry Kreisel lectures by Indigenous authors, Eden Robinson’s The Sasquatch At Home: Traditional Protocols & Modern Storytelling (2010, published 2011) and Tomson Highway’s A Tale of Monstrous Extravagance: Imagining Multilingualism (2014, published 2015), to demonstrate how Indigenous nonfiction employs complex rhetorical strategies in order to engage cross-cultural readers and address crucial issues related to contemporary Indigeneity. Both narratives are claimed to convey a fragile balance between cultural loss and cultural survival — a negotiation which is related theoretically to Judith Butler’s notions of vulnerability, precarity, and resistance, particularly to her premise that vulnerability and resistance do not have to be opposed and/or mutually exclusive but rather work in intricate relationships. The article shows that while Robinson (Haisla/Heiltsuk) combines family stories with ethnography to bear witness to both the precarity and resilience of Haisla cultural and ecological survival, Highway (Cree) presents a multimodal and multilingual performance to unsettle his audience through combining humor and confrontation. I ultimately argue that, if Indigenous writing has always expressed this duality of exposing vulnerability as well as inscribing resistance, then, it may serve as a model for transcending the binary structure powerful/powerless, a move that Butler sees as fundamental to her redefinition of vulnerability. In other words, through this optic the history of Indigenous writing is indeed a history of exploring the ways in which vulnerability and resistance relate and interweave, rather than stand in opposition.
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.