Different DNA damage response of cis and trans isomers of commonly used UV filter after the exposure on adult human liver stem cells and human lymphoblastoid cells

Investor logo
Investor logo

Warning

This publication doesn't include Faculty of Education. It includes Faculty of Science. Official publication website can be found on muni.cz.
Authors

SHARMA Anežka BÁNYIOVÁ Katarína BABICA Pavel EL YAMANI Naouale COLLINS Andrew Richard ČUPR Pavel

Year of publication 2017
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source Science of the Total Environment
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Science

Citation
Web https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969717305478?via%3Dihub
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.043
Keywords trans/cis-EHMC; Isomerization; Human risk assessment; Genotoxicity; Adult human liver stem cells; High-throughput comet assay
Description 2-ethylhexyl 4-methoxycinnamate (EHMC), used in many categories of personal care products (PCPs), is one of the most discussed ultraviolet filters because of its endocrine-disrupting effects. EHMC is unstable in sunlight and can be transformed from trans-EHMC to emergent cis-EHMC. Toxicological studies are focusing only on transEHMC; thus the toxicological data for cis-EHMC are missing. In this study, the in vitro genotoxic effects of trans- and cis-EHMC on adult human liver stem cells HL1-hT1 and human-derived lymphoblastoid cells TK-6 using a high-throughput comet assay were studied. TK-6 cells treated with cis-EHMC showed a high level of DNA damage when compared to untreated cells in concentrations 1.56 to 25 mu g mL(-1). trans-EHMC showed genotoxicity after exposure to the two highest concentrations 12.5 and 25 mu g mL(-1). The increase in DNA damage on HL1-hT1 cells induced by cis-EHMC and transEHMC was detected at the concentration 25 pg mL-1. The No observed adverse effect level (NOAEL, mg kg lbw day I) was determined using a Quantitative in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (QIVIVE) approach: NOAEL(trans-EHMC) = 3.07, NOAEL(cis-EHMC) = 0.30 for TK-6 and NOAEL(trans-EHMC) = 26.46, NOAEL(cis-EHMC) = 20.36 for HL1-hT1. The hazard index (HI) was evaluated by comparing the reference dose (RID, mg kg(-1) bw day(-1)) obtained from our experimental data with the chronic daily intake (CDI) of the female population. Using comet assay experimental data with the more sensitive TK-6 cells, HIcis-EHMC was 7 times higher than HItrans-EHMC In terms of CDI, relative contributions were; dermal exposure route > oral > inhalation. According to our results we recommend the RfD(trans-EHMC) = 0.20 and RfD(cis-EHMC) = 0.02 for trans-EHMC and cis-EHMC, respectively, to use for human health risk assessment. The significant difference in trans-EHMC and cis-EHMC response points to the need for toxicological reevaluation and application reassessment of both isomers in PCPs.
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.