Zurich II Statement on Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs): Scientific and Regulatory Needs

Investor logo
Investor logo
Investor logo

Warning

This publication doesn't include Faculty of Education. It includes Faculty of Science. Official publication website can be found on muni.cz.
Authors

DEWITT Jamie C. GLUGE Juliane COUSINS Ian T. GOLDENMAN Gretta HERZKE Dorte LOHMANN Rainer MILLER Mark NG Carla A. PATTON Sharyle TRIER Xenia VIERKE Lena WANG Zhanyun ADU-KUMI Sam BALAN Simona BUSER Andreas M. FLETCHER Tony HAUG Line Smastuen HUANG Jun KASERZON Sarit LEONEL Juliana SHERIFF Ishmail SHI Ya-Li VALSECCHI Sara SCHERINGER Martin

Year of publication 2024
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LETTERS
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Science

Citation
Web https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00147
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00147
Keywords Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances; PFASs; Zurich Statement; persistence; bilateralworkshops; international cooperation
Description Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are a class of synthetic organic chemicals of global concern. A group of 36 scientists and regulators from 18 countries held a hybrid workshop in 2022 in Zurich, Switzerland. The workshop, a sequel to a previous Zurich workshop held in 2017, deliberated on progress in the last five years and discussed further needs for cooperative scientific research and regulatory action on PFASs. This review reflects discussion and insights gained during and after this workshop and summarizes key signs of progress in science and policy, ongoing critical issues to be addressed, and possible ways forward. Some key take home messages include: 1) understanding of human health effects continues to develop dramatically, 2) regulatory guidelines continue to drop, 3) better understanding of emissions and contamination levels is needed in more parts of the world, 4) analytical methods, while improving, still only cover around 50 PFASs, and 5) discussions of how to group PFASs for regulation (including subgroupings) have gathered momentum with several jurisdictions proposing restricting a large proportion of PFAS uses. It was concluded that more multi-group exchanges are needed in the future and that there should be a greater diversity of participants at future workshops.
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.